| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration
''Lau Kong Yung v. Director of Immigration'' was a 1999 right of abode case in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal following closely on the heels of the landmark ''Ng Ka Ling v. Director of Immigration'' decision earlier that year. After ''Ng'' and the two prior actions in ''Lau'', but before the case came before the CFA, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of the People's Republic of China issued an interpretation of the Basic Law which affected the rights of Lau and his fellow applicants. ''Lau'' thus became the first case in which the CFA had to take into account an NPCSC interpretation in applying the Basic Law.
==Background==
Lau Kong Yung (劉港榕) and his 16 fellow applicants were mainland Chinese-born children of Hong Kong permanent residents and on that basis claimed to be entitled to the right of abode. The Director of Immigration made removal orders against them on the grounds that they had arrived in Hong Kong on two-way permits and subsequently breached their limit of stay, and did not hold certificates of entitlement to demonstrate their right of abode (which would include the right not to be subject to a removal order). They sued the Director in the Court of First Instance to quash the removal orders, stating that the Director had acted unlawfully in refusing to consider other evidence that they had the right of abode.〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Lau Kong Yung v Director of Immigration」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|